<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni)</title>
        <link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/topic/452/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I found a 5 cm f2 in black, in hte 74 xx range, but this lens has NO chrome filter ring, not even a filter ring at all.

If you compare it with a normal black 5 cm  f 2, you can see that instead of that chrome filter ring, there is a fitting black ring, but only the same hight as the other rings.
The inside ring (closest to the lens glass) has not the same shape as on a normal black, it is slightly different

It seems that some lenses lilke this were produced, but does any one knows more... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 06:15:04 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:29:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/6409/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-6409</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <br>
<br>
I have a simple answer. After 50 years, some of the filter rings become loose and easy to come off, I have three 5cm f2.0s and only the one I demonstrated is
loose enough so I can just unscrew the filter ring with hand, the other two are tight and do not come off. Another explanation would be filters! somtimes
filter won&#39;t come off, and as a result the filter and the filter ring unscrew together, as is evident by the fuzzzy picture of the Nikon SP I saw on ebay
and posted here.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NIKON KIU)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/6409</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:29:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/6402/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-6402</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/embarassed.gif" alt="image">Amazing, but still hard to believe. Would have loved to see
sharper pictures.
<br>
And do I see reflexion on glass in the filter ring ?
<br>
<br>
Question : why should one take of the filter ring ?
<br>
This kind of lens is found all over the world, and also without filter ring, so I cannot imagine that one person should
<br>
have done this work, and sent lenses all over the worldl.
<br>
Hard to... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (onlynikon)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/6402</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 04:04:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/6357/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-6357</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/frown.gif" alt="image"> Lens come to me....
<br>
what Kiu says is right.
<br>
Only a normal 50 mm f2  Hc lens with a not  strong glue on the chrome ring!!!
<br>
My , rare piece, dream is definitively broken<img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/ohwell.gif" alt="image">
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (stefcuoz)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/6357</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:35:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/6354/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-6354</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ And that book!!! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jonmanjiro)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/6354</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/6353/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-6353</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hey, I&#39;ve seen that lens before! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jonmanjiro)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/6353</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:44:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/6352/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-6352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Kui I just never kept a 50 f2 to try it on, but I have been saying this all along. Thanks for proving it. On the 50 1.4 the chrome ring is part of the front
lens group and comes out with the glass, on the 50 f2 is it just cemented in (or screwed tightly). ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Nikon HS Webmaster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/6352</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:46:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/6351/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-6351</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Kiu, i have found one of this  &quot;no chrome ring&quot; 50 mm F2.<img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/roll.gif" alt="image">
<br>
So this is a bluff? Is only a normal 50 mm without chrome ring? i have tryed to remove the chrome ring from one of my 50 mm black but it is very strong
attached.
<br>
There is a particulary 50 mm F2 with removable ring or i have bouth a normal 50 mm black with loosed ring?<img... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (stefcuoz)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/6351</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:00:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/6017/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-6017</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Since Fred doesn&#39;t want anything to do with this, I have to go at it alone!
<br>
Soooooo, I took one of my 5cm f2s and tuned the filter ring counterclockwise:
<br>
<img alt="image" src="http://images.yuku.com/image/pjpeg/b9725078489277aa0af1e669466ce4b86832468.pjpg">

<p><br></p>Notice the filter ring.
<br>
<br>
<img alt="image" src="http://images.yuku.com/image/pjpeg/53b350b9842894b57b27039514b9eb66d1e10d5.pjpg">

<p><br></p>Viola...a black 5cm F2....looks like the one Bob posted,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NIKON KIU)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/6017</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:31:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5972/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-5972</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Look at this picture:
<br>
<img height="266" src="http://i3.ebayimg.com/01/i/000/cd/c9/ed93_1.JPG" width="400" alt="image">

<p>The filter on the left looks like it&#39;s still attached to the front filter ring.
<br>
<br>
<font color="#9900FF">Kiu</font></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NIKON KIU)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5972</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 02:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5969/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-5969</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Nikon HS Webmaster wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Yep another one... I just don&#39;t know what to make of them.
</blockquote>

<p> </p>Are you ready to find out??
<br>
<br>
I am coming to NY...
<br>
<br>
<font color="#990000">Kiu</font> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NIKON KIU)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5969</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 02:58:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5968/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-5968</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yep another one... I just don&#39;t know what to make of them. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Nikon HS Webmaster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5968</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:50:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5967/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-5967</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Look like here is another black one with no filter ring on a SP. Serial #749257
<br>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;rd=1&amp;item=310010745577&amp;ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT&amp;ih=021
<br>
I have asked the seller to send me some close up images of the lens but he just can not do it! He started this auction with $9.95 and all of a sudden, he
changed it to BIN for $1,750.00!!
<br>
John ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jtengfoto)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5967</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5799/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-5799</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fred,
<br>
I am definitly coming....<span style="text-decoration:underline"><br>
<br>
Kiu</span> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NIKON KIU)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5799</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:16:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5732/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-5732</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This lens is discussed in Bobs new book, so Bob will not risk his reputation if he is not sure about the rarety of this lens, so it is not a simple take off of
the filterring, but they must have been factory made. Why is still a guess ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (onlynikon)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5732</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:46:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5613/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-5613</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I don&#39;t doubt Stephens meaning, that you can take off the filter ring
<br>
<br>
but when you look at those lenses without filterring, how can you screw in a filter ring ??
<br>
I can hardly believe lenses with filter ring that has been taken out are the same as those like in the picture of
<br>
Bob, I am sure both are different. One is normal lens with screwed out filter ring
<br>
the others (where we are talkinng about) are made without filter ring.
<br>
<br>
if it takes only 30 seconds... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (onlynikon)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5613</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:50:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5478/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-5478</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Nikon HS Webmaster wrote:</strong>
  <br>
  Someday someone will give me a black and chrome 50 F2 of a near serial number, I will take it apart and see what gives.
  <br>
  <br>
  If the filter ring is seperate then it&#39;s obvious... if one piece then the mystery deepens.
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
  <blockquote>
    <blockquote>
      <p><strong><strong><img height="550" alt="image" src="http://www.nikonhs.org/forum_images/compared.jpg"... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NIKON KIU)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5478</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:20:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5476/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-5476</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 5cm f2 lens sn 747097 there is a recessed filter ring that is approx. 1.51 inch or 37.75mm,  the threads are visible,   but I don&#39;t know anyone that made a
filter  that size.   lens weighs 4.5 oz.   came on nikon sp 6203333, 
<br>
<img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/jpeg/1811579742248755bd1ae33931886f58004e6fe.jpg" alt="image"><img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/jpeg/ece1539a42238a597d6dec67fda72e200e12baf.jpg" alt="image"><img... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nsp9107)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5476</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:13:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/656/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-656</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Bob,<br>
<br>
<blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Sorry for the lousy humor. I think I had too much sugar today.<hr></blockquote> <br>
we are just speculating!!<br>
<br>
Must be sake in your case....Vodka in mine!!!!!<br>
<span style="color:maroon;"><br>
Kiu</span> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NIKON KIU)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/656</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/666/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-666</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The filter ring on the 1.4 is not seperate, but part of the front element group, so it cannot come off.<br>
<br>
<!--EZCODE HR START--><hr /><!--EZCODE HR END--><br>
<br>
Someday someone will give me a black and chrome 50 F2 of a near serial number, I will take it apart and see what gives.   <br>
<br>
If the filter ring is seperate then it's obvious... if one piece then the mystery  deepens. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Nikon HS Webmaster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/666</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/655/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html#reply-655</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Question...<br>
<br>
If the missing filter ring fell off from some exotic combination of heat and expanding metals, then how come this rather strange happening has NEVER been reported on a black 50/1.4? Or any black lens with a chrome filter ring? Why is this only found on a FEW 50/f2 lenses? And 2 chrome ones as well?<br>
<br>
Sorry fellows, but that explanation really taxes the imagination. <br>
<br>
(Right up there with the world being round, which of course wasn't proven until 1969 when... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rotoloni)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/655</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 5cm  f 2 black (new photos by Rotoloni) ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/topic/452/t/5cm-f-2-black-new-photos-by-Rotoloni-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I found a 5 cm f2 in black, in hte 74 xx range, but this lens has NO chrome filter ring, not even a filter ring at all.<br>
<br>
If you compare it with a normal black 5 cm  f 2, you can see that instead of that chrome filter ring, there is a fitting black ring, but only the same hight as the other rings.<br>
The inside ring (closest to the lens glass) has not the same shape as on a normal black, it is slightly different<br>
<br>
It seems that some lenses lilke this were produced, but does any... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (onlynikon)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/topic/452</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 06:15:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>