<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Noct-Nikkor - Which version is more collectible?</title>
        <link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/topic/1555/t/Noct-Nikkor-Which-version-is-more-collectible-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ As you know there are 2 versions of this lens, AI &amp; AIS. As per Bjorn Rorslett optically
there are no major differences despite the differences in the aperture blades (7 vs 9). For usage I suspect it would be the AIS version because of the newer
coatings etc. I have owned 3 AIS versions and they have all been perfect. I have never owned an AI version as yet.



I presumed the more collectible version would be the AI version as it is rarer than the AIS
version (2000 vs 9000 as per Roland... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 03:43:36 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:22:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Noct-Nikkor - Which version is more collectible? ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/6504/t/Noct-Nikkor-Which-version-is-more-collectible-.html#reply-6504</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ There are a few lenses around #1929xx with a misengraving. Here is one more!
<br>
<br>
<img src="http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b80/nikon-nl/noctnikkor.jpg" alt="image">
<br>
<br>
Regards,
<br>
Nico
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nikonnl)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/6504</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:22:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Noct-Nikkor - Which version is more collectible? ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/6501/t/Noct-Nikkor-Which-version-is-more-collectible-.html#reply-6501</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I have heard some lenses of the Noct-Nikkor had printing errors. I saw this today for the first time!!
<br>
<br>
http://cgi.ebay.com/Nikon-AI-S-1-2-58mm-Noc-f-Nikkor-Noct-Nikkor_W0QQitemZ370049331194QQihZ024QQcategoryZ107925QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
<br>
<br>
<br>
<img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/pjpeg/c213595d97c14d7f5f65853882686fd22675d1b.pjpg" alt="image">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Chamster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/6501</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 07:54:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Noct-Nikkor - Which version is more collectible? ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5939/t/Noct-Nikkor-Which-version-is-more-collectible-.html#reply-5939</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think so Chamster. Unless you have an extremely rare object (very first or only sample) the most versatile will be(come) the most popular.
<br>
Nico
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nikonnl)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5939</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:35:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Noct-Nikkor - Which version is more collectible? ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5938/t/Noct-Nikkor-Which-version-is-more-collectible-.html#reply-5938</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hi Nico,
<br>
<br>
Many thanks for the reply. I definitely agree about the more versatility of the AIS version &amp; its popularity for practical use. Does this correlate with
the collectibility? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Chamster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5938</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:04:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Noct-Nikkor - Which version is more collectible? ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/reply/5936/t/Noct-Nikkor-Which-version-is-more-collectible-.html#reply-5936</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hi, if - for you - collecting = investing you should keep both versions. The last version is more popular as it fits more cameras, unless you have a very low
serial number of the first version. I have never seen differences in images taken with both versions. Most people are mystifying this lens, because of its high
price, hand polished front lens and rarety. I prefer the last version of the 50mm/1.2, which equals the Noct and - in some situations - is even better.
<br>
nico
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nikonnl)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/sreply/5936</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:08:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Noct-Nikkor - Which version is more collectible? ]]></title>
			<link>http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/topic/1555/t/Noct-Nikkor-Which-version-is-more-collectible-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font size="3">As you know there are 2 versions of this lens, AI &amp; AIS. As per Bjorn Rorslett optically
there are no major differences despite the differences in the aperture blades (7 vs 9). For usage I suspect it would be the AIS version because of the newer
coatings etc. I have owned 3 AIS versions and they have all been perfect. I have never owned an AI version as yet.</font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"></p>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Chamster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://nikonhistoricalsociety.yuku.com/topic/1555</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 03:43:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>